Results tagged “financial reform” from Regulating Wall Street

Money Market Funds Missing from the Senate Bill

by Philipp Schnabl and Marcin Kacperczyk

Money market funds are the stepchild of finance. Even though they manage more than $4 trillion in assets, you won't find them in the Senate's financial reform bill from last Thursday . Is this justified?

If you analyze the track record of money market funds up to 2007, you would think that the Senate bill got it right. Apart from a small hiccup in the early 1990s, not a single fund ever got into trouble. However, in August 2008, a large money market fund, the Reserve Primary Fund, went bankrupt. As a result of the Reserve Primary Fund's troubles, investors started pulling their money from the entire industry.

Faced with a panic, the government decided to act promptly. Three days after the start of the run, it announced that all money market funds would be guaranteed. This announcement successfully stopped the run, but it also meant that going forward investors expect to get bailed out again.

We therefore believe that the government has to explicitly acknowledge that money market funds will receive government support during times of crisis. Even though this may be unpopular in policy circles, this is an honest thing to do. How should the government do this? This blog post has the answer.

Financial Reform's 'Public Option'

by Thomas Cooley

How President Obama's consumer-protection plan threatens his plan to rein in Wall Street excess.

In the early proposals from the Senate Banking Committee, the creation of an independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) was a centerpiece of the proposed Restoring American Financial Stability Act.  The CFPA has drawn such fierce opposition that it is threatening to become like the public option was for health-care reform, a lightening rod for competing views about the proper role of government and a distraction to practical law-making. The media attention and financial-market reaction to the accusations that Goldman Sachs deceived investors about the nature of the synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) make one thing very clear: we need more transparency in financial markets. We have to get financial reform right so we mitigate the risk of future meltdowns of the system. The outrage over this case seemingly strengthens the hand of the Obama administration in getting the legislation it wants. In his speech to Wall Street on Thursday, President Obama stated, "It is essential that we learn the lessons of this crisis so we don't doom ourselves to repeat it. And make no mistake, that is exactly what will happen if we allow this moment to pass--an outcome that is unacceptable to me and to the American people." Fair enough. But it is surprising that they have courted failure by lumping regulatory reform together with consumer protection.

Read the full opinion editorial at

A Reasoned Approach To Executive Compensation

by Thomas F. Cooley

The Dodd bill makes some important improvements to corporate governance.

Since the onset of the financial crisis there has been a huge hue and cry about executive compensation, particularly compensation on Wall Street. It isn't hard to understand why, and it would not have been unexpected to see financial reform legislation that took a heavy-handed approach to "reforming" compensation practices. Early on in the crisis there were proposals to impose an 80% tax on bonuses and proposals to cap compensation in absolute terms. Last week members of the Angelides commission, charged with investigating the causes of the financial crisis, pummeled former Citi executives Charles Prince and Robert Rubin for getting generous compensation while the firm essentially collapsed around them.

We saw much of the same reaction in the 1930s. There was a huge public outcry over the compensation of Eugene Grace, the president of Bethlehem Steel ( BHMMQ.OB - news - people ), when it was revealed that he received a base salary of $12,000 and a bonus of more than $1.6 million in 1929. That amounts to $150,000 salary in 2010 dollars with a nearly $20 million bonus.

In spite of periodic expressions of outrage, efforts to "reign in" executive compensation have so far been relatively muted. The major pending legislation--Sen. Dodd's "Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2009"--makes some very cautious but important recommendations about compensation. There are four that are notable.

Read the full opinion editorial at


The Dodd-Frank Act, signed into law in July 2010, represented the most significant and controversial overhaul of the U.S. financial regulatory system since the Great Depression. Forty NYU Stern faculty, including editors Viral V. Acharya, Thomas F. Cooley, Matthew P. Richardson, and Ingo Walter, provide a definitive analysis of the Act, expose key flaws and propose solutions to inform the rules’ adoption by regulators, in a new book, Regulating Wall Street: The Dodd-Frank Act and the New Architecture of Global Finance (Wiley, November 2010).

About Restoring Financial Stability

Previously, many of these faculty developed 18 independent policy papers offering market-focused solutions to the financial crisis, which were published in a book, Restoring Financial Stability: How to Repair a Failed System (Wiley, March 2009).

About the Authors



Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.