- From first principles in terms of how economic theory suggests we should regulate the financial sector;
- In a comparative manner, relating the proposed reforms to those that were undertaken in the 1930s following the Great Depression;
- How the proposed reforms would have fared in preventing and dealing with the crisis of 2007 to 2009 had they been in place at the time.
A critical assessment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
by Viral Acharya, Thomas F. Cooley, Matthew Richardson, Richard Sylla and Ingo Walter
The global crisis started in US financial markets (Cecchetti 2007). US financial reform was thus always going to be a central pillar in the world's effort to avoid such crises in the future (Baldwin and Eichengreen 2008, Reinhart 2008, Acharya and Richardson 2009). After long deliberation and political haggling, the reform is finally ready in the form of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. This is widely described as the most ambitious and far-reaching overhaul of financial regulation in the US since the 1930s. Together with other regulatory reforms introduced by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Reserve (the Fed), and other regulators in the US and Europe, it is going to change the structure of financial markets in profound ways.
In our forthcoming book, Regulating Wall Street: The Dodd-Frank Act and the New Architecture of Global Finance, we provide our overall assessment of the legislation in three different ways:
Read the full opinion editorial on VoxEU.org.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: A critical assessment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
TrackBack URL for this entry: